"As a social good," says Richard Posner, the federal judge and iconoclastic conservative, "I think privacy is greatly overrated because privacy basically means concealment. People conceal things in order to fool other people about them. They want to appear healthier than they are, smarter, more honest and so forth." That isn't a defense of snooping as much as a warning of the flip side of privacy--concealing facts that are discreditable, including those that other people have a legitimate reason for knowing.
via news.cnet.com
no subject
Date: 2010-03-12 07:08 pm (UTC)When I keep things private it is mostly because I don't choose to let others know enough to form opinions on what I ought to do. The more information I give up, the more they feel enabled to decide how I ought to live my life. The "shoulds" don't start - can't start - if they don't know what I'm already doing.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-12 08:58 pm (UTC)I wonder how the elimination of privacy would affect communication. Much of our communication today is based on trying to understand someone else's position, or convince them of our own. What if there was no need to do that, because you could just look at a person's past and see which of their experiences prompted a certain decision?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-12 08:17 pm (UTC)Privacy is a social good because it offers, even briefly, ownership of that which is essentially un-ownable once it becomes public (ideas, words, pictures, time).
no subject
Date: 2010-03-12 08:35 pm (UTC)How about the idea that there are things about me that are nobody's god damn business? Or the fact that people can use innocuous knowledge (and not falsifying knowledge, like this guy is suggesting) about other people to cause damage to them in some way? Jeez. I'm a very open person, but I don't think openness should be the default.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-13 03:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-13 04:59 pm (UTC)