It’s Time to Legalize Drugs
2009-11-14 04:21 amOriginal: craschworks - comments
Via the Washington Post:
Drug manufacturing and distribution is too dangerous to remain in the hands of unregulated criminals. Drug distribution needs to be the combined responsibility of doctors, the government, and a legal and regulated free market. This simple step would quickly eliminate the greatest threat of violence: street-corner drug dealing.
We simply urge the federal government to retreat. Let cities and states (and, while we’re at it, other countries) decide their own drug policies. Many would continue prohibition, but some would try something new. California and its medical marijuana dispensaries provide a good working example, warts and all, that legalized drug distribution does not cause the sky to fall.
Having fought the war on drugs, we know that ending the drug war is the right thing to do — for all of us, especially taxpayers. While the financial benefits of drug legalization are not our main concern, they are substantial. In a July referendum, Oakland, Calif., voted to tax drug sales by a 4-to-1 margin. Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron estimates that ending the drug w
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 04:48 pm (UTC)and the root source of the problem.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 04:51 pm (UTC)How do you figure that?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 05:34 pm (UTC)and speaking of contaminated products and false labeling has the government eleminated that problem with all the money they've spent on it?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 05:41 pm (UTC)Yes. But I believe the exact topic in this sub-thread is quality assurance of production and distribution. That's not the same as the drug war, horrid as the drug war is.
and speaking of contaminated products and false labeling has the government eleminated[sic] that problem with all the money they've spent on it?
Both foods and drugs are have fewer contaminants and health risks than they did at the turn of the 20th century, before the FDA and ilk were created. Eaten any human thumbs in your burger lately? Bought a medicine without an ingredient list, containing heavy metals and other toxins? Thank the feds.
How exactly were you expecting this problem to be fully eliminated?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 05:49 pm (UTC)this dead horse has beaten into glue way to many times already in the past and i'm not in the mood to bother with it again here.
>>>How exactly were you expecting this problem to be fully eliminated?
i dont expect it to be eliminated so why spend billions of dollars a year on an incureable problem?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:28 pm (UTC)Was there an answer in that? Your line sounds very nonsensical.
i dont expect it to be eliminated so why spend billions of dollars a year on an incureable[sic] problem?
Because a partially solved problem is better than an unsolved problem. How is that not obvious?
Here's another way to think of billions of dollars per year: what is the dollar value of swaths of the population dying or falling ill due to dangerous food and drug supplies?
I'm arguing with a teenager here, right?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:23 pm (UTC)