[personal profile] archerships

You know, I think religion is a memetic meta-parasite. One that, with luck, will eventually fade into extinction.

But damn, if religion doesn’t inspire some cool architecture:

chang_03

chang_02

chang_01

Via levelhead.

Original: craschworks - comments

maybe

Date: 2007-09-30 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cspowers.livejournal.com
the fact that you think it's cool is an indication that it has touched something in your soul, which is of course what religion is all about.

Re: maybe

Date: 2007-09-30 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
I think the Hand's of Victory are equally cool. Same for many state buildings. I don't think that the feeling of awe has anything to do with the overall worth of the ideology/religion that lead to the creation of the work.

Date: 2007-09-30 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pasquin.livejournal.com
David Sloan Wilson, the evolutionary biologist, describes religions as adaptive at the group level. Meaning, unlike the Dawkinesque notion of it being an atavistic remnant, it is a way for members to compete.

Just as the Free State Project was a way of combining people of similar values together for common cause.

Date: 2007-09-30 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
That may be true. I've thought a fair bit about how to create a secular ideology/group identity that could successfully compete with religion, without creating it's own horrors.

Date: 2007-09-30 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pasquin.livejournal.com
I did a Salon on this very thing and how I feel O'ism does not acheive this aim.

I'd be very interested to hear your thoughts on the matter.

Date: 2007-10-01 12:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
Daniel Dennett's Breaking the Spell combines the two theories, with a hint of Freud's view*, into something a bit more complex.


*religion exists b/c of a fear of death

Date: 2007-10-01 12:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pasquin.livejournal.com
I've been meaning to read Dennett, he's so widely quoted. Thanks for the tip.