Bush/Clinton Dynasty
2007-09-27 01:18 pmThere’s a good chance that Hilary’s going to win the Democratic nomination, and the Presidency. If she does, she will also likely win a second term. If that happens, the Presidency will have been controlled for 28 years by only two families:
1988 - Bush
1992 - Clinton
1996 - Clinton
2000 - Bush
2004 - Bush
2008 - Clinton
2012 - Clinton
In 2016, Jeb Bush will be 63, still young enough to run for two Presidential terms. Therefore, there’s a non-negligible chance that the pattern will continue as follows:
1988 - Bush
1992 - Clinton
1996 - Clinton
2000 - Bush
2004 - Bush
2008 - Clinton
2012 - Clinton
2016 - Bush
2020 - Bush
The pattern could even theoretically be carried further. By 2024, Chelsea Clinton will be 44 years old, old enough to run herself. And the Bush family certainly has enough kids in the wing to continue the dynasty.
When two families have a good chance of controlling the presidency for over a quarter of a century, it suggests to me that there’s a systemic problem with our selection process. After all, out of the 300+ million people in the U.S., is it really plausible that the people best suited to lead would come from one of these two families?
Original: craschworks - comments
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-28 01:52 am (UTC)Yeah, I was in a rush. I was able to word it a little more smoothly over on my own LJ about a half-hour later.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 08:58 pm (UTC)Agreed.
Oops.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 09:03 pm (UTC)I think dynasties are kind of silly, but if they're the result of the working democratic process, I can't complain that much. You'd either have to assert that there's some kind of conspiracy to keep these families in power or that the voters are just really shallow/stupid. The former is ridiculous and the latter... well, that's democracy for you.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 09:23 pm (UTC)Agreed. Which is the point of my post. A lot of people think that democracy is a magical process which automatically leads to the best outcome. I'm trying to disillusion them.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 11:20 pm (UTC)People get so...something when I try to point out all the epic flaws in democracy.
At the very least, Bush and others need a new thesaurus. Democracy is not another word for freedom or panacea.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-28 02:51 pm (UTC)Best and brightest
Date: 2007-09-28 01:40 am (UTC)