Date: 2007-03-27 01:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kindofstrange.livejournal.com
Yeaaaaah... kind of hoping that misses this area for the most part (a few reports I've seen have stated massive slides everywhere save for here and Portland). I got in on a pre-sale early last year, but I'm still edgy about potential slides in the market around these parts. Ah well, we'll see in a year, when I'm able to make a decision on to sell or to keep. I went by the rule of 3 and didn't overextend myself, so hopefully I should be a-okay. Here's hopin', at least.

a year's a long time

Date: 2007-03-27 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] integreillumine.livejournal.com
It seems like it's a little delayed in the northwest, also subtler because Seattle's growing.

Re: a year's a long time

Date: 2007-03-27 02:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kindofstrange.livejournal.com
Yup, I know it is. I've got to hold onto it until March of next year at the earliest, to skirt capital gains tax.

Date: 2007-03-27 01:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madkiwi.livejournal.com
Read that website for amusement purposes only.

However, www.thehousingbubbleblog.com is a compendium of serious articles, news stories and opinions from all over, and it will scare you enough.

Sold the house in January, so far the cash we received is on track to earn nearly 8% this year (over $40,000). Which is a good thing considering I quit my job after we closed escrow.

Date: 2007-03-27 07:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
Thanks for the link!

Date: 2007-03-27 03:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rah.livejournal.com
Sorry, they lost me at "renting is better than buying." And who the hell is renting "nice" houses in San Francisco for $1,800 a month?!?!

Yes, there are time periods of about five years when real estate in high population areas (like the LA example) have lost value, but over the long-term it's still the safest investment out there.

And this is coming from someone that kept crying that the bubble would burst when everyone else was saying it would only deflate a little.

Date: 2007-03-27 03:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
I believe the author wrote that can rent a nice house in the San Francisco Bay Area for $1800/month, not necessarily San Francisco City proper. According to this page, the estimated median gross rent for 2005 is $1148. So $1800 now does not seem out of line:

http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/bayarea.htm


Date: 2007-03-27 05:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harryh.livejournal.com
You think that purchasing real estate with 10:1 (or higher) leverage is a safer investment than buying an stock market index fund with no leverage? You're a crazy man if you think this is true.

In Marin, no problem

Date: 2007-03-27 06:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danlyke.livejournal.com
I can't speak to the city proper, but there's lots of decent places to live up here in Marin for $1,800. If you use the base number of money costs you $700/month per hundred thousand (and maybe it's a little lower right now because of interest rates, but that's a good back-of-the-envelope), that should get you a quarter of a million dollar place, but that same house will sell for closer to $800k.

You can do a lot with the interest on the $550k difference besides pay it to the bank.

I rent

Date: 2007-03-31 07:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adam--selene.livejournal.com
Yeah, I rent for $950 and the owner wants more than $1M to sell. You'd think they didn't each arithmetic in this country, because that's not even uncommon. They'll have a rude awakening, the bubble here seems to be a magnitude of that up north, with no local economy to support it (relying almost entirely on foreign buyers and speculators).


Date: 2007-03-27 07:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rillifane.livejournal.com
Not a very sound bit of writing.

The assertion that "realtors have a near-monopoly on sale price information" should immediatley leap out as a bit misleading. All that it takes is to check out the local property tax database. If we have one here in rural Smith county texas there is surely one you can check online in every real city.

Date: 2007-03-27 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
Good point regarding the property tax database.

Date: 2007-03-31 08:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adam--selene.livejournal.com
That assumes property tax valuations approximate actual sales prices. A $500k property here might get listed with a value of $5k for the transfer tax and property taxes, and no one blinks. Cheating on taxes is a national sport. Although if a capital gains tax ever passes, this practice could really screw owners that later may have to declare a more realistic value.

You could also dig up mortgage data (harder but more reliable).