We're seeing lot's of indignation over so-called "price gouging" right now. What you don't see is much discussion of how goods would be allocated in the absence of "price gouging". As
politisheep points out:
"...In the absence of gouging using money, people gouge the old-fashioned way: with their fists or with weapons.
I can't win in a fistfight. I don't own a firearm. With scarcity of something desperately needed, money is my only shot at getting it; I can't beat up the guy in front of me for it.
More importantly, I have to ask myself how I'd prefer that the guy in front of me beat me out for a needed, scarce item. Would I prefer he paid the guy money I don't have and can't compete with? Or would I prefer he punched me in the head and kicked me in the ribs? Would I prefer being shot over being outbid on that last cab ride home?
Easy, easy, easy call. I prefer price gouging, even if the result is that I'm priced out of a particular good."
no subject
Date: 2005-09-05 10:38 pm (UTC)I'm afraid a lot of people have that same attitude. That's why it's important to keep explaining frequently why price controls are so bad and why they create scarcity rather than magically eliminate it.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-06 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-06 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-05 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-06 01:38 am (UTC)Oh, wait. I guess that still means you're fucked.
But at least you get to set the price!
no subject
Date: 2005-09-06 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-06 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-06 09:05 pm (UTC)