[personal profile] archerships
Via Flutterby:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/06/17/MNGLU77EOC1.DTL&type=science

Swingers may be slaves to genes
Scientists find promiscuous voles lack key brain function linked to monogamy


Alan Zarembo, Los Angeles Times

Scientists working with a ratlike animal called a vole have found that promiscuous males can be reprogrammed into monogamous partners by introducing a single gene into a specific part of their brains.

Once they have been converted, the voles hang around the family nests and even huddle with their female partners after sex.

"A mutation in a single gene can have a profound impact on complex social behavior," said Larry Young, a neuroscientist at Emory University who reported the results in the current issue of the journal Nature.



The research helps shed light on monogamy -- a rare social behavior -- and hints that perhaps specific genes could play a role in human relationships.

Voles, found in the wild throughout much of North America, have been particularly useful in studying monogamy, which in biology refers more to the complicated social bonds based on partnership than to absolute sexual fidelity.

One variety -- the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) -- pairs up like humans. Males may occasionally stray from their lifelong partners, but they inevitably return to their nests and help care for litter after litter.

In contrast, meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), a similar but separate species, prowl their habitat for any available female and show no interest in staying in touch.

The difference, it turns out, is a receptor for the hormone vasopressin. Prairie voles have such receptors in a part of the brain known as the ventral pallidum. Meadow voles do not.

To make promiscuous male meadow voles behave like their loyal prairie cousins, the scientists used a common gene-therapy technique. They injected the animals' forebrains with a harmless virus carrying the gene responsible for expressing the receptors.

Each vole, a young virgin who had never before encountered a member of the opposite sex, then spent 24 hours caged with a female that had been injected with estrogen. They mated.

Then each male was placed in his own Plexiglass complex. Leashed in one room was his original partner. Down the hall was another female primed for mating.

The 11 genetically altered voles overwhelmingly stuck to their first partner.

The voles in the control group did not consistently seek out their original partners.

What looks like romance, the researchers suggested, may be the product of two neural pathways in the pleasure center of the brain.

There is the gratification of sex, which depends on dopamine receptors in a part of the brain known as the nucleus accumbens. But next door, in the ventral pallidum, are the vasopressin receptors, which allow for individual recognition.

The result: sexual preference for a specific partner.

Fewer than 5 percent of mammals are monogamous. Scientists believe that monogamy evolved from polygamy. The results released today suggest that flipping one genetic switch in a complex web of genes may have been enough to spur a major social reordering.

Human relationships, of course, are complicated, and culture and socialization probably matter as much as biology. Even so, Young suggested that genetic differences could help explain why some men have trouble maintaining relationships.

Gene Robinson, head of neuroscience at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, cautioned against extrapolating the results to humans. "The behavior of animals is much simpler than the behavior of humans," he said.

In any case, don't expect gene therapy for human swingers.

"This is not something that we should be playing around with," Young said.

Date: 2004-06-18 01:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] auriam.livejournal.com
Hmm.. now, this begs the question.. how do we get the gene OUT of someone if it's already there? I mean, sometimes you see the perfect person, and she/he's already 'locked up'.. but just infect 'em with the retrovirus carrying a knockout gene for the monogamy curse, and voila, a better world.. *muahaha*

Date: 2004-06-18 01:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
Yes, darn it. I want my Love Potion #9!

Date: 2004-06-18 01:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kindofstrange.livejournal.com
You mean, Love Retrovirus

But yeah, I'd punch (and worse) anyone who attempted to inject me with something to make me 'better'.

Date: 2004-06-18 01:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
Love Retrovirus. Yeah, that's it.

Oooh. This could be a great game concept. Forget zombies. You're a female unwittingly staying at the same hotel as a Star Trek convention. Someone releases a virus that causes the infected person to fall madly in love with the next person they see. You've been exposed, the clock is ticking, and you're surrounded by 3000 men who look like Comic Store Guy....

Date: 2004-06-18 01:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kindofstrange.livejournal.com
That's just sick.

Freak.

;)

Date: 2004-06-18 02:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
I grossed out a girl who collects rotted bird carcasses. Boo-yah!

Date: 2004-06-18 01:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] auriam.livejournal.com
Hmm.. you could even just infect YOURSELF with the Love Potion virus, and surreptitiously, slowly but surely, everyone you came into close contact with would become a 'swinger' (well, if not yours, SOMEONE'S.) You could call the gene the International Gene Of Mystery, after everyone's favorite swinger..

Date: 2004-06-18 01:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] polyanarch.livejournal.com
Brave new world...

Date: 2004-06-18 02:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gentlemaitresse.livejournal.com
That's fascinating.

**considers the implications**

**grins**

Date: 2004-06-18 02:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
Am I just happy to see you or is that a syringe in your pocket?

Date: 2004-06-18 12:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mentalmural.livejournal.com
"The research helps shed light on monogamy -- a rare social behavior - ..."

I would think they meant this is true for voles, but the way its written would lead one to think this applied to us. If monogamy is a rare human social behavior, why are so many pretending to be so?

Date: 2004-06-20 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] galith.livejournal.com
I believe they meant rare in animals rather than in people ala Fewer than 5 percent of mammals are monogamous.

Monogamy Gene

Date: 2004-06-19 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The curious thing is that the monogamy gene looks like a very small ball and chain.