[personal profile] archerships
CRAN, or "calorie restriction with adequate nutrition", is one of the few, if not only, methods of increasing maximum lifespan that has strong scientific evidence to support it. It has been shown to work in everything from nematodes, to fruit flies, to rats. Preliminary studies in monkeys suggest that it will work in primates as well. However, what if you don't start CRAN until middle age? Does it still provide a benefit? Current research suggests that even starting late in life may significantly increase lifespan.

THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE APPEARED ON CNN.COM/HEALTH 9/22/03
Study: Even mid-life diet change can extend life
WASHINGTON (AP) --It has long been known that laboratory animals live longer
on a low-calorie diet. Now a study suggests that even if sensible eating is
delayed until middle age, health can be improved and life extended.
A study on diet and life in the journal Science dealt only with laboratory
fruit flies, but researchers said some of the same effects may apply to
mammals, perhaps even humans.
In the study, British researchers compared the effects of different
calorie-restricted diets on the mortality of fruit flies. They found that
fruit flies on restricted diets lived about 90 days, twice as long as those
fed on a normal diet.
But the scientists also found that when heavily fed fruit flies were
switched at middle age -- day 14 to 22 -- to leaner diets, then the animals
converted from the shorter life pattern of the overfed to the longer-lived
pattern of flies that had been on a restricted diet all their lives.
The carry-home message from the study, said Linda Partridge of University
College London is that it is never too late to improve health by switching
to sensible eating habits.
"If this works in humans, then it means that from the time a person starts
on a restricted diet, they'll be like individuals of the same age who were
always on that diet," she said. "Their prospects of survival are the same."
Partridge said that although the life-extending effects of short rations
have never been proven in humans, it has been shown in monkeys, mice, rats
and fruit flies that diet restrictions will lead to longer lives.
"There is no reason to suppose it wouldn't apply equally to humans," she
said. "There are diet restriction studies now underway with monkeys and all
the indications appear the same [as with mice, rats and fruit flies]."
James R. Carey, a University of California, Davis, researcher who studies
the biology of aging, said the Partridge study is "important to the field,"
but does not provide final answers about the true effects of restricted
diets.
He said that fruit flies and other animals on restricted diets tend to stop
reproducing. In mammals, for instance, the females stop ovulating and,
hence, cannot reproduce.
As a result, Carey said, animals on restricted diets may live longer simply
because they are not expending energy and stress in the rigors of
reproduction. He said studies still need to specifically isolate and prove
that it is the lean diet alone that leads to longer life, and not related
factors.

Date: 2003-09-26 05:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squirrellady.livejournal.com
You saw the recent Slashdot discussion didn't you? This comment in particular is interesting.

Calorie Restriction

Date: 2003-09-27 09:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bhv.livejournal.com
I have been wanting to try calorie restriction for some time, but have been hesitant because it conflicts with my goal of building muscle. So today I've got great abs and can lift a lot more weight than I used to, but I am definitely not on a calorie restricted diet.

I've been considering finding a dietitian to help me set up a plan that could allow for muscle growth while staying on the lean side of the calorie curve.

Date: 2003-09-26 08:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] auriam.livejournal.com
True.. but if the diet relies merely on eating half as much as one 'wants' to eat.. well, those mice wouldn't be living very long if they were getting all they wanted to eat. Therefore, the choices for us humans are; 1) eat half as much out of some act of will, and live with miserable hunger pangs for the rest of our lives, or 2) keep eating normally and say, 'huh. well, I guess a short life but a merry one, eh?'.. and I can guess what most people will do.
Of course there's always 3), figure out how this works, and find a way to do it without being constantly hungry (ie, turn off the hunger signals of the body.. and that's not that bad an idea; you can't starve to death suddenly; there'd be ways to notice you needed more fuel other than hunger..)

food for thought

Date: 2003-09-26 08:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jozafiend.livejournal.com
There are foods you can eat which will provide the feeling of satiation so you're not always hungry. Guar gum, for instance, is something you can add to food or some people make desserts with it like guar gum pudding (*). Scientists are working on your #3 idea as well - Satietrol®: http://www.hungeroff.com/

(*) see the CRsocity archives for guar tips
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CRsupportgroup/messages/3101?viscount=100

Date: 2003-09-26 09:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kittles.livejournal.com
Hmm, what this tells me is that so long as I remain childfree, I'll live longer without having to diet. :p

Date: 2003-09-26 09:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
Hmmm...I suppose it all depends on perspective....you, the individual would live longer, but your genes....

(I remember reading somewhere that childfree women do, in fact, live longer on average. But CRAN would probably help you live even longer.)

Date: 2003-09-26 09:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kittles.livejournal.com
My general thoughts on dieting are that if I have to diet to live longer, there'd be no point to living. ;)

Date: 2003-09-30 10:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
Yes, few people are willing to make the trade-off. Eventually, scientists will figure out why CR works, and they you can just take a pill to mimic its effects.

Date: 2003-09-26 10:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mlinksva.livejournal.com
I hadn't ever heard that childfree women live longer, but today someone posted to the CR list on reproduction and longevity. I haven't read the studies linked to, but I gather there maybe possibly might be mabe be some longevity cost. The story about beginning CR midlife that Chris copied has also been discussed extensively on the CR list recently.

Date: 2003-09-30 10:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
Thanks! Joined the CR list, as the archive seems to be otherwise inaccessible.

Date: 2003-09-26 12:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adifferentpath.livejournal.com
Let us know how your new diet goes, Crasch. I'll try not to mention the ice cream I ate last night.

Date: 2003-09-30 10:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
Ah, who says I'm on CR? Willing spirit, weak flesh, you know. I blame Frito-Lay.

Congrats on your weight loss by the way.