You're the filthy rich
2003-09-07 08:48 pmThink you'd be happy if you were in the top 1% of income earners in the U.S.? Now consider this: from the world perspective, if you make more than $35,000/year, you're already in the top 1%. You're the filthy rich. Even the "working poor" in the U.S. (defined as families of four making less than $18 K/year) still make more than all but 9% of the world's population.
Read more about what it really means to be poor in Donald Sensings essay: Wealth and poverty in America and the world.
Read more about what it really means to be poor in Donald Sensings essay: Wealth and poverty in America and the world.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 06:18 pm (UTC)Stupid comparisons.
Date: 2003-09-07 06:45 pm (UTC)What money is traded for on the currency markets doesn't always have much to do with what cost of living is or the purchasing power of a currency unit in that country.
Purchasing power is a much bigger thing than just checking the exchange rates. If this was comparing purchasing power, it'd be a hell of a thing to find out. As it is, I just learned that it costs a lot to live in America. Someone making my salary in most non-western nations would be able to afford servants and such. I live in a third floor flat with two roommates.
What exactly is it supposed to prove, that technically our money is supposed to mean more than theirs?
Re: Stupid comparisons.
Date: 2003-09-07 07:15 pm (UTC)It's still probably very valid, even in terms of buying power. The poor in this country have a heck of a lot higher standard of living than most others.
Re: Stupid comparisons.
Date: 2003-09-07 11:15 pm (UTC)is high. There are a lot of mandatory things you
have to pay like car insurance. After tax and
mandatory costs, you don't save much. In my
opinion, saving is what counts. From a financial
point of view, the saving rate is equivalent to
profit in a company's financial statement.
Re: Stupid comparisons.
Date: 2003-09-08 02:55 am (UTC)And I totally agree with the statement that poverty in this world is caused more by (bad) politics than any other factor.
This from a girl who grew up in Haiti. I was a missionary kid, and fervently believe my parents were doing a very Good Thing (providing free health care) in Haiti. But in the larger picture it is an exercise in futility to treat symptoms and not the disease, which was bad politics. If all the missionaries down there and all the do-gooders up here would have put the same effort into the political system of Haiti as they did its citizens, the citizens would probably be better equipped right now to take care of themselves. The whole property rights thing can't be emphasized enough, and seeing property rights erode in this country scares me more than anything. When more and more you do NOT have a right to the property you create - your money, you have less incentive to create it. And the economy is not helped by that, people.
I just mention Haiti as an anecdotal example, but its not unique.
Re: Stupid comparisons.
Date: 2003-09-08 03:19 am (UTC)a person with an investment mindset, I see saving,
life style, and health important to me, so my decision
is always to keep them in balance based on what I
have and the situation I am in.
The solution for poverty is education. Knowledge
is what gives people power to make right decisions
and generate wealth for themselves. Charities
and religious activities only serve people's need
to feel good about themselves but not the
practical economic needs, which is the most
important thing when one deals with the reality.
In my opinion, the cause of bad politics is
fear. People who are in power and not well-educated
are afraid of those with knowledge. They will
try to prevent people from obtaining good education
and be knowledgeable and powerful. I have seen
this in many countries and organizations around
the world.
Re: Stupid comparisons.
Date: 2003-09-08 03:59 am (UTC)Re: Stupid comparisons.
Date: 2003-09-08 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 08:45 am (UTC)However, would using better measures of comparison change the result? I don't know, but I would wager that by most any other measure of wealth, someone making $35 K/year in the U.S. would still end up in the top 1% in a worldwide comparison. How would you bet?
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 07:41 am (UTC)yeah
Date: 2003-09-08 08:42 am (UTC)And video games
and
and
and
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 09:49 am (UTC)amen.
Date: 2003-09-08 05:02 pm (UTC)=darwin
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 11:56 pm (UTC)Enjoy the guilt
Date: 2003-09-10 09:00 pm (UTC)