Hmmm...how exactly does one become "110%" compatible?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-05-28 01:03 pm (UTC)I think their quiz needs a bit of work. They seemed to be trying for a Keirsey/Myers-Briggs type assessment, but failing due to poor question design. The devil, as the saying goes, is in the details. I suspect that if I were to retake the quiz a few days from now when I've forgotten my original responses, I would answer many of the questions with the opposite response.
Other than that minor quibble, though, I think it's a great idea.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-28 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-29 12:06 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-05-29 06:41 am (UTC)93%
Date: 2003-05-28 02:39 pm (UTC)In answer to your first question:
4.) I'm 102% compatible with someone! Shouldn't it be capped at 100%?
We thought it would sound more exciting if certain high-scoring match compatibility results were allowed to exceed 100%. If you get a compatibility score over 100%, then it probably means good things for you!
no subject
Date: 2003-05-28 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-28 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-28 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-28 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Re:
Date: 2003-05-28 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-29 12:15 am (UTC)